Topic outline
-
Leitura obrigatória:
Scheidel, Walter (2017). The Great Leveler. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Introdução. Pp. 1-23.
Leituras complementares:
Kuznets, Simon (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, Volume 45, Issue 1, Mar, pp. 1-28, 1955.
Piketty, T. (2014). O Capital no Século XXI. São Paulo: Intrínseca. Capítulos Sete (Desigualdade e Concentração: primeiras impressões) e Oito (Os dois mundos). Pp. 233-295.
Piketty, Thomas and Saez, Emmanuel (2014). Inequality in the long run. Science, Volume 344, Issue 6186, May, pp. 838-42.
Piketty, Thomas (2015). Putting Distribution Back at the Center of Economics: Reflections in the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Economics Perspectives, Volume 29, Number 1, pp. 67-88.
Alvaredo, Facundo; Atkinson, Anthony B.; Piketty, Thomas; Saez, Manuel (2013). The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective. Journal of Economics Perspectives, Volume 27, Number 3, pp.3-20.
-
Leitura obrigatória:
Acemoglu, Daron; Johnson, Simon; Robinson, James A. Acemoglu (2005). Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth, in: Handbook of Economic Growth, Edited by Philippe Aghion and Steven N. Durlauf. Elsevier. Chapter 6.
- RESENHA ATÉ PAGINA 428 -
Leituras complementares:Acemoglu, D; Naidu, S.; Restrepo, P. and Robinson, J. (2015). “Democracy, Redistribution, and inequality”, in: Atkinson, A. Bourguignon, F. (2015). Handbook of Income Distribution. Volume 2B. Oxford: North-Holland. Pp.1885-1960.
Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James A (2015). The Rise and Decline of General Laws of Capitalism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 29, Number 1, pp. 3-28.
-
Leituras obrigatórias:
Meltzer, A. H. and Richard, S. F (1981). A Rational Theory of the Size of Government, Journal of Political Economy, 89, pp. 914-27.
Downs, Anthony [1957](1999). Uma Teoria Econômica da Democracia. São Paulo: Edusp. Cap. 7
Leituras complementares:
Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Lupu, Noam and Pontusson, Jonas (2011). The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution. The American Political Science Review, Volume 105, Número 2, pp. 316-36.
-
- Leitura obrigatória:
Esping-Andersen, G. (1991). As três economias políticas do Welfare State. In: Lua Nova, No. 24.
Huber, Evelyne and Stephens, John D. (2013) Democracy and the Left. Social policy and inequality in Latin America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Capítulo 2 (Theoretical Framework and Methodological Approach).
Leituras complementares:
Arretche, Marta T. S. (1995). "Emergência e desenvolvimento do Welfare State: teorias explicativas". In: BIB: Boletim Bibliografico de Ciências Sociais, No. 39
Batista, Cristiane (2008). "Partidos Políticos, Ideologia e Política Social na América Latina: 1980-1999", DADOS. Revista de Ciências Sociais, Vol. 51, no 3, 2008, pp. 647-86.
Bradley, David; Huber, Evelyne; Moller, Staphanie; Nielsen, François; Stephens, John D. (2003). Distribution and Redistribution in Post-industrial Societies. World Politics, 55, pp. 193-228.
Castles, Francis (1986). Social Expenditure and the Political Right: a methodological note. European Journal of Political Research, 14: 669-76.
Castles, Francis G. and Obinger, Herbert (2007). Journal of European Social Policy, 17(3): 206-22.
Hibbs Jr., Douglas A. (1977). Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy, The American Political Science Review, LXX1(4): 1467-1487, December.
Huber, Evelyne; Pribble, Henny; Nielsen, François, Stephens, John D. (2006). Politics and Inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean, American Sociological Review, 71: 943-63.
Kingstone, Peter and Young, Joseph (2009). Partisanship and Policy Choice. What’s Left for the Left in Latin America? Political Research Quarterly, 62 (1): 29-41.
-
Leitura obrigatória:
Przeworski, Adam. “A social-democracia como um fenômeno histórico”. in: Przeworski, Adam. Capitalismo e Social-democracia. São Paulo, Companhia das Letras, 1989. Cap. 1.
Leitura complementar:
Przewroski, Adam and Wallerstein, Michael (1988). Structural Dependence of the State on Capital. The American Political Science Review. Volume 82, Número 1, pp. 11-29.
-
Leitura obrigatória:
Rueda, David (2005). Insider-outsider Politics in Industrialized Countries: the challenge to social democratic parties. The American Political Science Review, Volume 99, Número 1, pp. 61-74.
Leitura complementar:
Iversen, Torben and Soskice, David (2001). An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences. The American Political Science Review. Volume 95, Número 4, pp. 875-891.
-
Leituras obrigatórias:
Page, Benjamin and Gilens,Martin (2017). Democracy in America? What has gone wrong and what we can do about it. Cap 2 (Unequal Wealth Distorts Politics?) and Cap 3 (Thwarting the Will of the People). Pp.
Achen C. and Bartels, L. (2016). Democracy for Realists. Why Elections do not produce responsive government. Cap 1 (Democratic Ideals and Realities) e Cap 4 (A Rational God of Vengeance and of Reward ? Th e Logic of Retrospective Accountability).
Leituras complementares:
Bartels, Larry (2008). Unequal Democracy. Cap 9 (Economic Inequality and Political Representation). Pp. 252-282.
Gilens, Martin (2012). Affluence and influence: economic inequality and political power in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Cap 3 (The Preference/Policy Link) e Cap 4. (Policy Domains and Democratic Responsiveness) Pp. 70-123
Karabarbounis, Loukas. 2011. “One Dollar, One Vote.” Economic Journal, 121:621–651.
Scheve, Kenneth and Stasavage, David (2017). “Wealth Inequality and Democracy”, Annual Review of Political Science, 20:451–68.
-
Leitura obrigatória:
Hacker, Jacob S. and Pierson, Paul (2010). Winner-Take-all Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States. Politics & Society, Volume 38, Número 2, pp. 152-204.
Leituras complementares:
Hacker, Jacob S. and Pierson, Paul. (2014). After the "Master Theory": Downs, Schattschneider, and the Rebirth of Policy-Focused Analysis. Reflections, Volume 12, Número 3, pp. 643-62.
Pierson, Paul (ed.) (2001). The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pierson, Paul (1994). Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, Paul (ed.) (2001). Coping with Permanent Austerity: welfare state restructuring in affluent democracies, in: Pierson, P. The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Leitura obrigatória:
Pierson, P. (2001). “Coping with Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Reestructuring in Affluent Democracies”, in: PIERSON, P. (ed.). The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leituras complementares:
Levy, J. D. (1999). “Vice into virtue? Progressive Politics and welfare reform in Continental Europe”, Politics & Society 27(2): 239-73.
Hacker, J. S. (2004). Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: the hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States, The American Political Science Review, 98(2): 243-60.
Huber, E. & Stephens, J. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: parties and policies in global markets, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Myles, J. & Pierson, P. “Friedman´s revenge: the reform of ´liberal´ welfare states in Canada and United States”, Politics and Society 25: 443-472.
Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, Paul (2001). “Post-industrial Pressures on the Mature Welfare States”, in in: PIERSON, P. (ed.). The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pierson, P. (1996). “The New Politics of the Welfare State”, in: World Politics, 48(2):143-79.
Swank, Duane (2001). “Political Institutions and Welfare State Restrucutuing: the impact of institutions on social policy change in developed democracies”, in: Pierson, P. (ed.). The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Leituras obrigatórias:
Fairfield, Tasha and Garay, Candelaria (2017). Redistribution under the Right in Latin America: Electoral Competition and Organized Actors in Policy Making. In: Comparative Political Studies. Volume 50 (14): 1871–1906.
Feierherd, G., Larroulet, P., Long, W., & Lustig, N. (2023). The Pink Tide and Income Inequality in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 65(2), 110-144. doi:10.1017/lap.2022.47 (Alina vai relatar)
Roberts, Kenneth M (2016). The politics of inequality and redistribution in Latin America’s post-adjustment era, in: Cornia, G. (2014) Falling Inequality in Latin America: Policy Changes and Lessons. Oxford University Press. (Felipe vai relatar)
Leituras complementares:
Birdsall, Nancy; Lustig, Nora; McLeod, Darryl (2011). Declining Inequality in Latin America: Some Economics, Some Politics. Working Paper, 1120,
Tulane University.Lustig, Nora (2015). Inequality and Fiscal Redistribution in Middle Income Countries: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru, and South Africa. Center for Global Development. Working Paper 410.
Roberts, Kenneth M. (2012). The politics of inequality and redistribution in Latin America's post-adjustment era, WIDER Working Paper, No. 2012/08.
-
Leituras obrigatórias:
Arretche, Marta (2018). Democracia e redução da desigualdade econômica no Brasil: a inclusão dos outsiders, in: Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, vol. 33, n. 96: pp. 1-23. (Talita vai relatar)
Amory Gethin, Marc Morgan. Democracy and the Politicization of Inequality in Brazil, 1989-2018. (2021) (Leticia vai relatar)
Soares, Sergei (2010). "O ritmo na queda da desigualdade no Brasil é aceitável?", Revista de Economia Política, v. 30, p. 364-380, 2010. (John vai relatar)
Souza, Pedro Herculano Guimarães Ferreira de (2016). “Os Ricos e a Desigualdade no Brasil ao longo de Nove Décadas”. A desigualdade vista do topo: a concentração de renda entre os ricos no Brasil, 1926-2013. Tese de Doutorado, UNB. Capítulo 5. (Sabrina vai relatar)
Leituras complementares:
Barros, Ricardo P. de; Carvalho, Mirela de; Franco, Samuel; Mendonça, Rosane (2006). Uma Análise das Principais Causas da queda recente na desigualdade de renda brasileira. Econômica, 8(11): 117-47.
Neri, Marcelo; Herculano, Pedro (2012). A Década Inclusiva (2001-2011): Desigualdade, Pobreza e Políticas de Renda. Comunicados do IPEA, no. 155 Brasília: IPEA.
Silveira, Fernando Gaiger; Rezende, Fernando; Afonso, José Roberto; Ferreira, Jhonatan (2013). Fiscal Equity: Distributional Impacts of Taxation and Social Spending in Brazil. Working Paper do International Policy Center for Inclusive Growth, no. 115. Brasília, draft.
Soares, Sergei S. D (2006). “Distribuição de Renda no Brasil de 1976 a 2004 com ênfase entre 2001 e 2004. Texto para Discussão IPEA no. 1166.
-
Leituras complementares:
Gobetti, Sergio Wulff e Orair, Rodrigo Octávio (2015). Progressividade Tributária: a agenda esquecida. Monografia XX Prêmio do Tesouro Nacional.
Gobetti, Sérgio W. and Orair, Rodrigo Octávio (s.d). Distribuição e Tributação da Renda no Brasil. Novas Evidências a partir das declarações fiscais das pessoas físicas. Mimeo.
Medeiros, Marcelo; Souza, Pedro H. G. F.; Castro, Fabio Avila (2015). O Topo da Distribuição de Renda no Brasil: primeiras estimativas com dados tributários e comparação com pesquisas domiciliares, 2006-2012. Dados. Revista de Ciências Sociais, 58 (1): 7-36.
Medeiros, Marcelo; Galvão, Juliana de Castro; Nazareno, Luísa (2015). A Composição da Desigualdade no Brasil. Conciliando o Censo 2010 e os Dados do Imposto de Renda. Texto para Discussão IPEA. no. 2147
Medeiros, Marcelo: Souza, Pedro Herculano Guimarães Ferreira de; Castro, Fábio Ávila de (2015). A estabilidade da desigualdade de renda no Brasil, 2006 a 2012: estimativa com dados do imposto de renda e pesquisas domiciliares, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 20(4):971-986.
Milá, Marc Morgan (2015). Income Concentration in a Context of Late Development: An Investigation of Top Incomes in Brazil using Tax Records, 1933–2013. Mimeo.
Souza, Pedro H. G. F and MEDEIROS, Marcelo (2015). Top Income Shares and Inequality in Brazil, 1928-2012. Sociologies in Dialogue, 1(1): 119-32.