Programação
13/09 – Prática etnográfica, comunidades e populações indígenas na Arqueologia
OBS: Esta aula ocorrerá excepcionalmente no turno da manhã (9h30 às 13h).
TEXTOS:
URIARTE, U.M. O que é fazer etnografia para os antropólogos. Ponto Urbe (online), 11.2012. http//pontourbe. revues.org/300
PEIRANO, M. Etnografia, ou a teoria vivida. Ponto Urbe (online), 2. 2008. http//pontourbe. revues.org/1890
STRATHERN , M. O efeito etnográfico. São Paulo: Cosac Naiff, 2OI4, p.345-405.20/09 – Prática etnográfica, comunidades e populações indígenas na Arqueologia
TEXTOS:
SMITH, L. e WATERTON, E. Heritage, communities and Archaeology. London: Duckworth, 2009, p.11-54.
ATALAY, S. Community-Based Archaeology. Research with, by, and for Indigenous and Local Communities. Berkely: University of CaIifornia, 2012, p.1-28.
27/09 – Analogia etnográfica (abordagem histórica-direta)
TEXTOS:
LYMAN, R.L. e O'BRIEN, M.J. The direct historical approach, analogical reasoning, and theory in americanist archaeology. Journal of Archaelogical Theory and Method, 8(4): 303-323, 2001.
STEWARD, J.H. 1942. The direct historical approach in archaeology. American Anthropologist, 31:491-495.
FEWKES, J.W. 1896. The prehistoric culture of Tusayan. American Anthropologist, 9: 151-173.STRONG, W.D. 1933. The plains culture area in the light of archaeology. American Anthropologist 35(2): 271-287.
WEDEL, W. The direct-historical approach in Pawnee archaeology. Smithsonian Miscellaneus Colletions, 97 (7): 1-21, 1938.
FRICKEL, P. Tradição tribal e arqueologia no Tumucumaque. Revista do Museu Paulista, N.S.: 471-491, São Paulo. 1964.
FRICKEL, P. Ometanímpe, os Transformados. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi (NS). Antropologia, (17). 1961. 15pp.
04/10 – Analogia etnográfica (analogia geral)
Textos
LYMAN, R.L. e O'BRIEN, M.J. The direct historical approach, analogical reasoning, and theory in americanist archaeology. Journal of Archaelogical Theory and Method, 8(4): 303-323, 2001.
ASCHER, R. Analogy in archaeological interpretation. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 17: 317-325, 1961.
BINFORD, L. R. Smudge pits and hide smoking: The use of analogy in archaeological reasoning. American Antiquity, 32(1): 1-12, 1967.
BINFORD, L. R. Methodological considerations of the archaeological use of ethnographic data. in: R. B. Lee e I. De Vore (eds). Man the hunter. Chicago: Aldinem 1968, p. 268-273.
CHANG, K.C. Major aspects of the interrelationship of archaeology and ethnology. Current Anthropology, 8:227-243. 1967.
11/10 – Etnoarqueologia processual
TEXTOS:
LANE, P. Present to past In: David, B. e Thomas, J. Handbook of Material Culture. Los Angeles: SAGE London, 2010, p. 402-424.
POLITlS, G. Reflections on contemporary ethnoarchaeology. Pyrenae, 46(1): 41-83, 2015.
BINFORD, L.R. Willow Smoke and Dogs’ Tails: Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation. American Antiquity, 45:4-25. 1980.
GOULD, R.A. The archaeologist as ethnographer: a case study from the western desert of Australia.
CARRER, F. Interpreting intra-site spatial patterns in seasonal contexts: an ethnoarchaeological case study from the Western Alps. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24: 303-327, 2017.
COSTIN, C.L The use of ethnoarchaeology for the archaeological study of ceramic production. Journal of Archaeologícal Method and Theory, 7(4): 377-403, 2000.
18/10 – Etnoarqueologia pós-processual
TEXTOS:
LYONS, D. e CASEY, J. It's a material world: the critical and on-going value of ethnoarchaeology in understanding variation, change and materiality. World Archaeology, 48(5): 609-627, 2016.
DAVID, N., STERNER, J. e GAVUA, K. Why pots are decorated? Current Anthropology, 29(3):365-389. 1988.
LYONS, D. Witchcraft, gender, power and intimate relations in Mura compounds in Déla, Northern Camerron. World Archaeology, 29(3):344-362. 1998.
GOSSELAIN, O.P. Materializing identities: an African perspective. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7(3): 187-217, 2000.
25/10 – Arqueologia do presente, etnografia arqueológica e etnografia da arqueologia
Arqueologia do presente, etnografia arqueológica e etnografia da arqueologia
TEXTOS:
GONZALEZ-RUIBAL. De Ia etnoarqueología a Ia arqueologia dei presente. In: J. Salazar; 1. Domingo; J.M. Azkárraga e H. Bonet (eds). Mundos tríbales. Una vísíón etnoarqueológíca. Valencia: Museu de Prehistoria de Valencia. 2008, p. 16-27.
HAMlLAKIS, Y. Archaeological ethnography: a multitemporal meeting ground for archaeology and
anthropology. Annual Revíew of Anthropology, 40: 399-414. 2011EDGEWORTH, M. Multiple origins, development, and potential of ethnographies of archaeology. In: M. Edgeworth (ed). Ethnographíes of Archaeologícal Practíces. Rowman: Altamira Press. 2006, p. 1-19.
01/11 – Práticas colaborativas e o movimento de descolonização da arqueologia
TEXTOS:
COLWELL, C. Collaborative archaeologies and descendant communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45: 113-127, 2016.
HOLLOWELL, J. e NICHOLAS, G. Using ethnographic methods to articulate community-based conceptions of cultural heritage management. In: Y. Hamilakis e A. Anagnostopoulos (eds). Archaeological ethnographies: a special issue of public archaeology. Publíc Archaeology, 8 (2- 3): 141-160.2009.
COLWELL-CHANTHAPHONH, C. Myth of the Anasazi: archaeological language, collaborative communities, and contested past. In: Y. Hamilakis e A. Anagnostopoulos (eds). Archaeological ethnographies: a special issue of public archaeology. Public Archaeology, 8 (2-3): 191-207, 2009.
SILLIMAN, S.W. e DRING, K.H. Working on pasts for futures. Eastern Pequot field school archaeology in Connecticut. In: S. Silliman (ed). Collaborating at the trowel's edge. Teaching and learning in indigenous archaeology. Tucson: The Uiniversity of Arizona Press. 2008, p.67-87.
HECKENBERGER, M. Entering the 'agora': archaeology, conservation, and indigenous peoples in the Amazon. In: C. Colwell-Chanthaphonh e T.J. Ferguson. Collaboration in Archaeological Practice. Engaging Descendent Communities. Lanham:Altamira Press. 2008, p. 243-272.
22/11 – Práticas colaborativas e o movimento de descolonização da arqueologia
TEXTOS:
CUDDY, T.W. e LEONE, M. New Africa: understanding the americanization of African descente groups through archaeology. In: C. Colwell-Chanthaphonh e T.J. Ferguson. Collaboration in Archaeological Practice. Engaging Descendent Communities. Lanham:Altamira Press. 2008, p. 203-223.
PRYBYLSKI, M.E. e STOTTMAN, M.J. Recconecting community. Archaeology and activism at the Portland wharf. In: M.J. Stottman (ed). Archaeologists as activists. Can archaeologists change the world? Tuscaloosa:The University of Alabama Press. 2010, p.126-140.
GNECCO, C. e HERNÁNDEZ, C. History and its discontents. Stone statues, native history, and archaeologists. Current Anthropology, 49(3): 439-466. 2008.
CASTAÑEDA, Q. The 'past' as transcultural space: using ethographic installation in the study of archaeology. In: Y. Hamílakis e A. Anagnostopoulos (eds). Archaeological ethnographies: a special issue of public archaeology. Public Archaeology, 8 (2-3): 262-282. 2009.
29/11 - A relação entre antropologia e arqueologia e a transformação do pensamento arqueológico
TEXTOS:
LUCAS, G. Triangulating absence: exploring the fault-lines between archaeology and anthropology. In: D. Garrow e T. Yarrow (eds). Archaeology & Anthropology. Understanding similarily, exploring difference. Oxford: Oxbow Books. 2010, p. 28-39.
INGOLD, T. No more ancient; no more human: the future past of archaeology and anthropology. In: D. Garrow e T. Yarrow (eds). Archaeology & Anthropology. Understanding similarily, exploring difference. Oxford: Oxbow Books. 2010, p. 160-170.
FERRElRA, L. M. (2013). Essas coisas não Ihes pertencem: relações entre legislação arqueológica, cultura material e comunidades. Revista de Arqueologia Pública, 7: 87-106.
HABER, A. Decolonizing archaeological thought in South America. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45: 469-485, 2016.