Aperçu des sections
-
Bibliografia:
PITOFSKY, R. The Political Content of Antitrust. 127 U. PA. L. REV. 1051, 1075, 1979.
BORK, R. Goals of Antitrust: A Dialogue on Policy. 65 Columbia L. Rev. 365, 1965.
HOVENKAMP, H. Antitrust Policy and Inequality of Wealth. Faculty Scholarship. 1769, 2017.
-
Bibliografia:
SHAPIRO, C. Antitrust in a Time of Populism, 2017.
VOORHEES, T. The Political Hand in American Antitrust: Invisible, Inspirational, or Imaginary? 79 Antitrust Law Journal No. 2, 2014.
STUCKE, M. Occupy Wall Street and Antitrust. 85 Southern California Law Review Postscript 33, 2012.
-
Bibliografia:
SOKOL, D. Monopolists without borders: The institutional challenge of international antitrust in a Global Gilded Age. Berkeley Business Law Journal, Vol. 4, 2007, pp. 52-69; 69-81; 118-120.
KOVACIC, W.; HYMAN, D. Regulatory Leveraging: Problem or Solution? GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2016-41.
OCDE. Challenges of International Co-operation in Competition Law Enforcement, 2014. Obrigatório: pp. 21-38; 49-54. Complementar: pp. 9-20; 39-48.
-
Bibliografia:
DE CARVALHO. V. M. A Política de Defesa da Concorrência Quatro Anos Depois: Ainda em Busca de Melhores Práticas? In: A Lei 12.529/2011 e a Nova Política de Defesa da Concorrência, 488, 2015
SALOMAO FILHO, C. Paralisia Antitruste. In: Estudos de Direito Econômico e Economia da Concorrência: estudos em homenagem ao Prof. Fábio Nusdeo, 2009.
WAKED, D. Adoption Of Antitrust Laws In Developing Countries: Reasons And Challenges. Journal of Law, Economics and Policy, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016.
DE LEON, I. Latin American Competition Policy: From Nirvana Antitrust Policy To Reality-Based Institutional Competition Building. 83 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 39 (2008).
-
BIBLIOGRAFIA
AUER, Dirk; PETIT, Nicolas, Two-Sided Markets and the Challenge of Turning Economic Theory into Antitrust Policy (January 20, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2552337.
Grunes, Allen P.; Stucke, Maurice E. “No Mistake About It: The Important Role of Antitrust in the Era of Big Data”. University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper no. 269 (2015). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2600051.
Khan, Lina. “Amazon’s antitrust paradox”. Yale Law Journal 126, no. 3 (2016-2017): 712-805. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/e.710.Khan.805_zuvfyyeh.pdf.
-
BIBLIOGRAFIA
BUTTÀ, Antonio. Google Search (Shopping): an overview of the European Commission´s Antitrust Case. Italian Antitrust Review. vol. 5, n. 1, 2018, 45-60. http://iar.agcm.it/article/view/12872/11648.
COMISSÃO EUROPEIA. Resumo da Decisão da Comissão de 27 de junho de 2017 relativa a um processo nos termos do artigo 102.o do Tratado sobre o Funcionamento da União Europeia e do artigo 54.o do Acordo EEE [Processo AT.39740 — Google Search (Shopping)]
CRANE, Daniel A. "Search Neutrality as an Antitrust Principle." Geo. Mason L. Rev. 19, no. 5 (2012): 1199-209. https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1126&context=articles.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. “Statement of the Federal Trade Commission Regarding Google’s Search Practices In the Matter of Google Inc.”. FTC File Number 111-0163 January 3, 2013.
-
BIBLIOGRAFIA
OECD. Algorithms and Collusion: Competition Policy in the Digital Age, 2017. www.oecd.org/competition/algorithms-collusion-competition-policy-in-the-digital-age.htm.
Picht, Peter Georg; Freund, Benedikt, Competition (Law) in the Era of Algorithms (May 15, 2018). Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 18-10. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3180550.
US Department of Justice. Plea Agreement, United States v. David Topkins [30 April 2015] https://www.justice.gov/atr/case-document/file/628891/download; Information, United States v. David Topkins [6 April 2015] https://www.justice.gov/atr/casedocument/file/513586/download.
-
BIBLIOGRAFIA
BUNDESKARTELLAMT. Case Summary. B6-22/16. Facebook, Exploitative business terms pursuant to Section 19(1) GWB for inadequate data processing. 15 February 2019. https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidung/EN/Fallberichte/Missbrauchsaufsicht/2019/B6-22-16.html?nn=3600108.
COLANGELO, Giuseppe; MAGGIOLINO, Mariateresa. “Data Accumulation and the Privacy-Antitrust Interface: Insights from the Facebook Case for the EU and the U.S.”. TTLF Working Paper no. 31 (2018): 1-48, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3125490.
-
Bibliografia:
Perfectly Competitive Innovation. Michele Boldrin e David K. Lenine. http://www.micheleboldrin.com/Papers/pci39.pdf
Competition and Innovation. Michele Boldrin, Juan C Allamand, David K Levine e Carmine Ornaghi. http://www.dklevine.com/papers/cato-ppp-boldrin.pdf
BURK, Dan L., LEMLEY, Mark A. The Patent Crisis and how the courts can solve it. Chicago Press. Cap. 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 12 e conclusão.
FELDMAN Robin. Rethinkimg Patent Law. Harvard Uni Press. Introduction, 1, 3, 5 e Conclusion.
BESSEN, James. MEURER, Michael J. Patent Failure. Princeton. Capítulos 1, 2, 10, 11 e 12.
CASTRO, Carla Frade. Propriedade intelectual no CADE: a evolução para a afirmação de uma competência. Revista do IBRAC, v. 23, p. 241.
-
Bibliografia:
Perfectly Competitive Innovation. Michele Boldrin e David K. Lenine. http://www.micheleboldrin.com/Papers/pci39.pdf
Competition and Innovation. Michele Boldrin, Juan C Allamand, David K Levine e Carmine Ornaghi. http://www.dklevine.com/papers/cato-ppp-boldrin.pdf
BURK, Dan L., LEMLEY, Mark A. The Patent Crisis and how the courts can solve it. Chicago Press. Cap. 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 12 e conclusão.
FELDMAN Robin. Rethinkimg Patent Law. Harvard Uni Press. Introduction, 1, 3, 5 e Conclusion.
BESSEN, James. MEURER, Michael J. Patent Failure. Princeton. Capítulos 1, 2, 10, 11 e 12.
CASTRO, Carla Frade. Propriedade intelectual no CADE: a evolução para a afirmação de uma competência. Revista do IBRAC, v. 23, p. 241.
-
Bibliografia:
FRAZÃO. Ana. Direito antitruste e direito anticorrupção: pontes para um necessário diálogo. In: Constituição,
Empresa e Mercado. Brasília: FD/UnB, 2017, FRAZÃO, Ana (Org.).
GOODMAN, Josh. The Anti-corruption and Antitrust Connection. Theantitrustsource, 2013. In: https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/antitrust_source/apr13_goodman.authcheckdam.pdf. -
Bibliografia:
CADE. Guia Programa de Compliance: orientações sobre estruturação e benefícios da adoção dos programas de compliance concorrencial. 2016
ABRANTES-METZ, Rosa M.; SOKOL, D. Daniel. Antitrust Corporate Governance and Compliance. Antitrust Corporate Governance and Compliance. Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Research Paper No. 13-18. University of Minnesota Law School, 2013.
BARROSO, Luís Roberto. Prefácio. CUEVA, Ricardo Villas Bôas; FRAZÃO, Ana (coord.). Compliance: perspectivas e desafios dos programas de conformidade. Belo Horizonte: Fórum, 2018.
Conselho Executivo das Normas-Padrão (CENP). Entrevista com Tercio Sampaio Ferraz Junior. Todos ganham com o compliance. CENP em Revista. Ano 10, n. 39, jun. 2014.
PEREIRA NETO, Caio Mario da Silva; LANCIERI, Filippo Maria. Alguns apontamentos sobre programas de compliance antitruste focados em condutas unilaterais no Brasil. In: RODAS, João Grandino; CARVALHO, Vinicius Marques de (org.). Compliance a Concorrência. 2. ed. rev. atual. e ampl. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2016.
RILEY, Anne; BLOOM, Margaret. Antitrust Compliance Programmes – Can Companies and Antitrust Agencies do More? In: OCDE. Promoting Compliance with Competition Law. Policy Roundtables, 2011.
SCHAPIRO, Mario Gomes; MARINHO, Sarah Morganna Matos. Compliance concorrencial: cooperação regulatória na defesa da concorrência? RIL Brasília, a. 53 n. 211 jul./set. 2016.