Kursthemen
-
Monitores:
Diurno: Rodrigo Lyra. Contato: roplyra@gmail.com
Noturno: Victor F. de Almeida. Contato: victoralmeida@usp.br
-
CASTRO, Thales. Teoria das relações internacionais. Brasília: FUNAG, 2012. Capítulo 5.2 e 5.3, p. 310- 359.
SARFATI, Gilberto. Teoria das Relações Internacionais. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2005. Capítulo 1 e 2, p. 23-46.
-
Leitura obrigatória:
MEARSHEIMER, John J. The tragedy of great power politics. New York/London: W.W Norton and Company, 2001. Caps 1 e 2 , p. 29-54.WALTZ, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. Boston: Mc Graw Hill. Cap ,6 p. 102 a 128.
Leitura complementar:
BROOKS, Stephen. “Dueling Realisms", International Organization, Summer, (1997). JSTOR
-
Leitura obrigatória:
KEOHANE, Robert & NYE, J. Poder e interdependência. La política mundial em transição. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano, 1988, pp. 15-58.
KEOHANE, Robert & NYE, J. Power and interdependence revisited. International Organizations, Vol. 41, Issue 4 (Autumn, 1987), pp. 725-753.KEOHANE, Robert. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984, pp. 31-46.
SNIDAL, Duncan. The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory, International Organization, Vol. 39, No. 4 (Autumn, 1985), pp. 579-614Leitura complementar:
KINDLEBERG, Charles. "Systems of International Economic Organization," in David Calleo, ed., Money and the Coming World Order. New York: New York University Press, 1976. -
Leitura obrigatória:
BALWIN, David A . “Neoliberalism, neorealism and world politics”. In: BALWIN, David (ed.), (1993), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. Columbia University Press, New York, NY. Pp. 3-25.
GRIECO, Joseph. “Understanding the problem of international cooperation”. The limits of neoliberal institutionalism and the future of realistic theory”. In: BALWIN, David (ed.), (1993), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press, NY.
-
Leitura obrigatória:
MILNER, Helen. Interests, institutions and information: domestic politics and international relations. Princenton: Princeton University Press, 1997. Introducao e cap. 4.
ALLISON, Graham T. Essence of Decision. Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little/Brown, 1971.PUTNAM, Robert. (1988). “Diplomacy and domestic politics. The logic of two-level games” International Organization, Vol. 42(3), Jstor.
Leitura complementar:
KAHLER, M. 1993. “Bargaining with the IMF: Two-level strategies and developing countries.” In EVANS, P., JACOBSON, H. e PUTNAM, R. Eds. International Bargaining and Domestic Politics: Double-Edged Diplomacy. Berkely, C.A.: University of California Press.
GARRET, Geofrey & LANGE, Peter. “Internationalization, Institutions and political change”. In: KEOHANE, Robert & MILNER, Helen (eds.). Internationalization and domestic politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. -
NIEMANN, Arne; SCHMITTER, Philippe. Neofunctionalism. In: WIENER, Antje, e DIEZ, Thomas (eds.). European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
FREITAS, Luís Sargento. The "Brexit" process understood under neofunctionalist and intergovernmentalist theories of European Integration. ALACIP, 2017.
HUANG, Eric Rong-yang. The Limitation of Neo-functionalism for Explaining Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations (1979-1996). 1997.
HAAS, Ernest. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces 1950-57. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958.
-
-
Leitura obrigatória:
BULL, Hedley. A sociedade Anárquica. Brasília: Editora UNB/Imprensa Oficial São Paulo, 2002, pp. 7-94.
BUZAN, B. From international to World society? English school theory and the social structure of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 27-62.
LINKLATER, A. & Suganami, H. The English school of international relations. A contemporary reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 12-80.
Leitura complementar:
HALLIDAY, Fred. Repensando as relacoes internacionais. Porto Alegre: Editora da Universidade Federal de Rio Grande do Sul, 1999. Cap.6: “Ausente das relacoes internacionais: as mulheres e a arena internacional”. -
Leitura obrigatória:
ADLER, Emanuel. “O construtivismo no estudo das relações internacionais”, Lua Nova, (47, 1999): 201-246.
ONUF, Nicholas. "Anarchy, Authority, Rule", International Studies Quarterly, 33, 149-174, 1989. JSTOR._____________. “Levels”. European Journal of International Relations, 1, 35-58, 1995., JSTOR
WENDT, Alex. Sociology of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 246-312._____________“Anarchy is what states make of it”, International Security (46), (1995): 391- 285. JSTOR
Leituras complementares :
MESSARI, Nizar. “Segurança no pós-Guerra Fria: o Papel das Instituições”. In Estevez, Paulo Luiz (org). Instituições Internacionais: Segurança, Comércio e Integração. Belo Horizonte, Editora da PUC-Minas, 2003.
HURREL, Andrew. “An emerging security community in South America? In: ADLER, Emanuel & BARNETT, Michael (eds.) Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Presss, 1998.
RISSE-KAPPEN, Thomas. “U.S power in a liberal security community”. In: G. John Ikenberry (ed.) America Unrivaled: the future of power the balance power. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2002.
WENDT, Alex. “Collective identity formation and the international state”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 88 (2): 384-394. JSTOR
Wendt, Alexandre. . “Construing international politics”, International Security, (20), (1995) -
Leitura obrigatória:
ASHLEY, R. K. & WALKER, R.B. ”Speaking the language of exile: dissidence in international studies”, Special Issue of International Studies Quarterly 34, (1990). JSTOR
COX, Robert. “Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations Theory”. In: KEOHANE, Robert. The neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia, 1986.
LINKLATER, A. The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the pos- Wesphalian era. Columbia: University of South Carolina., 1998, pp. 14-66
-
Leitura obrigatória:
SAID, Edward. Orientalism. London: Penguin, 1977, pp. 18 a 74.
PUCHALA, Donald. Third word thinking and contemporary international relations, in: International relations theory. NEUMAN, Stephanie C (ed.). New York: San Martins Press, 1998, pp. 133-158.
TICKNER, Arlene B . (2013). Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist International Relations: 19(3) 627–646.
TICKNER, Ann. (2001). Gendering World Politics. New York: Columbia, University Press, pp. 1-64.
-
Leitura obrigatória
BROWN, Chris.(2013). The poverty of Grand Theory European Journal of International Relations, 19: 483-497.
LAKE, David A. (2013) Theory is dead, long live theory: The end of the Great Debates and the rise of eclecticism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19: 567-58.DUNNE, Tim; HANSEN, Lene and WIGHT, Colin. (2013) . The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations, 19: 405-425.
-