Programação
-
Monitoria:
- Irma Dutra (mirnadri@gmail.com)
- Orion Noda (o.noda@usp.br)
-
Textos para debate:
WALT, S. (2005). The Relationship between Theory and Policy in International Relations. in Annual Review of Political Science, No. 8, 2005, pág. 23-48.
CHECKEL, J. (2012). “Theoretical Pluralism in IR: possibilities and limits”. in Carlsnaes, W. et al. Handbook of International Relations. 2a Edição. Londres: Sage Publications, pág. 220-241.
HERMANN, R. (2002). “Linking Theory to Evidence in International Relations” in Carlsnaes, W. et al. Handbook of International Relations. 1a Edicão. Londres: Sage Publications, pág. 119-136.
WALT, S. e MEARSHEIMER, J. (2013). Leaving Theory Behind: why hypothesis testing became bad of IR. Faculty Research Working Paper Series.
-
Texto obrigatório:
WALTZ, K. (2002). Teoria das Relações Internacionais. Lisboa: Gradiva, Cap 5 e 6, pág. 113-178.
Leituras complementares:
BROOKS, S. (1997). Dueling Realisms. in International Organization, Vol. 53, No. 1.
SCHWELLER, R. (1993). Tripolarity and the second war. in International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 1.
-
Texto obrigatório:
MEARSHEIMER, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W Norton and Company, Caps 2 e 3 , pág. 29-82.
Leituras complementares:BROOKS, S. (1997). Dueling Realisms. in International Organization, Vol. 53, No. 1.
SCHWELLER, R. (1993). Tripolarity and the second war. in International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 1.
-
Texto obrigatório:
KEOHANE, R. (1984). After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, Caps. 4, 5 e 6, pág. 49-109.
Leituras complementares:
KEOHANE, R. e MARTIN, L. (1995). The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. in International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1.
GRIECO, J. (1993). “Understanding the problem of international cooperation: the limits of neoliberal institutionalism and the future of realistic theory”. in Balwin, D. (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press, pág. 3-25.
-
Texto obrigatório:
WALLERSTEIN, I. (1999). “Patterns and Perspectives of the Capitalist World Economy”. in Viotti, P. e Kauppi, M. International Relations Theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond. Boston: Longman pág, 227-233.
Leitura complementar:
VIGEVANI, T. et al. (2010). A Contribuição Marxista para o Estudo das Relações Internacionais. Paper apresentado no 7o Encontro da ABCP, Recife.
-
Textos obrigatórios:
WENDT, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics, in International Organization, Vol. 46, No 2.
WENDT, A. (2007). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cap. 2, pág. 92-138.
Leitura complementar:
ADLER, E. (1999). O construtivismo no estudo das relações internacionais. in Lua Nova, No. 47, pág. 201-246.
FEARON, J. e WENDT, A. (2002). “Rationalism v. Constructivism: a skeptical view”. in CARLSNAES, W. et al. Handbook of International Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002, pág. 52-72.
-
Texto obrigatório:
COX, R. “Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations Theory”. in KEOHANE, Robert. (1986). The neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Leitura complementar:LINKLATER, A. (1996). “The achievement of critical theory”, in Smith, S. et al. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SILVA, M. (2005). Teoria Crítica em Relações Internacionais. in Contexto Internacional, Vol. 27, No. 2.
-
Texto obrigatório:
WALKER, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/Outside: international relations as political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cap. 1, pág. 1-25.
Leitura complementar:
DEVETAK, R. (1995). Postmodernism. in Burchill e Linklater (org.). Theories of International Relations. New York: St. Martin Press.
BROWN, C. (1994). “Critical Theory and postmodernism in international relations”, in Groom, A. e Light, M. Contemporary international relations: a guide to theory. Londres: Pinter Publishers.
-
Texto obrigatório:
TICKNER, J. Ann. (1992). Gender in International Relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security. New York: Columbia University Press, Cap. 1, pág. 1-26.
THIEL, M. (2014). LGBTQ Politics and International Relations: Here? Queer? Used to it? in International Politics Review, Vol 2, No. 2, pág. 51-60.
Leitura complementar:
TICKNER, J. Ann. (2002). “Feminist Perspectives on International Relations”. in CARLSNAES, W. et al. Handbook of International Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002, pág. 275-291.
WITHWORTH, S. (2008). “Feminism”. in SNIDAL, D. e REUS-SMIT, C. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SJOBERG, L. (2012) Towards trans-gendering IR? in International Political Sociology, Vol. 6, No. 4, pág. 337-354.
-
Texto obrigatório:
CHOWDHRY, G. e NAIR, S. (2002). Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender, and Class. Londres: Routledge, Introdução, pág. 1-32.
Leitura complementar:
DARBY, P. e PAOLINI, A. (1994). Bridging International Relations and Postcolonialism. in Alternatives, Vol. 19, No. 3, pág. 371-397.
SAID, Edward. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books, Introdução, pág. 1-28.
-
Textos obrigatórios:
MORRICE, D. (2000). The liberal-communitarian debate in contemporary political philosophy and its significance for International Relations. in Review of International Studies, Vol. 26, pág. 233-246.
ADLER, E. (2005). Communitarian international relations: the epistemic foundations of International Relations. Oxford: Routledge, pág. 3-14.
Leitura complementar:
GUIMARÃES, F. (2008). O Debate entre Comunitaristas e Cosmopolitas e as Teorias de Relações Internacionais: Rawls como uma Via Média. in Contexto Internacional, Vol. 30, No. 3, pág. 573-583.
COCHRAN, M. (1999). Normative theory in international relations: a pragmatic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pág. 21-44 e 52-72.