Topic outline

  • General

    Collapse all Expand all

    Monitores:

    Diurno: Rodrigo Lyra. Contato: roplyra@gmail.com

    Noturno: Victor F. de Almeida. Contato: victoralmeida@usp.br


  • AULA 2 REVISÃO DAS TEORIAS CLÁSSICAS DAS RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS

    CASTRO, Thales. Teoria das relações internacionais. Brasília: FUNAG, 2012. Capítulo 5.2 e 5.3, p. 310- 359.

    SARFATI, Gilberto. Teoria das Relações Internacionais. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2005. Capítulo 1 e 2, p. 23-46.


  • AULA 3 REALISMO DEFENSIVO E OFENSIVO

    Leitura obrigatória:

    MEARSHEIMER, John J. The tragedy of great power politics. New York/London: W.W Norton and Company, 2001. Caps 1 e 2 , p. 29-54.


    WALTZ, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. Boston: Mc Graw Hill. Cap ,6 p. 102 a 128.

    Leitura complementar:


    BROOKS, Stephen. “Dueling Realisms", International Organization, Summer, (1997). JSTOR


  • AULA 4 INTERDEPENDÊNCIA COMPLEXA E ESTABILIDADE HEGEMÔNICA

    Leitura obrigatória:

    KEOHANE, Robert & NYE, J. Poder e interdependência. La política mundial em transição. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano, 1988, pp. 15-58.

    KEOHANE, Robert & NYE, J. Power and interdependence revisited. International Organizations, Vol. 41, Issue 4 (Autumn, 1987), pp. 725-753.


    KEOHANE, Robert. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984, pp. 31-46.

    SNIDAL, Duncan. The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory, International Organization, Vol. 39, No. 4 (Autumn, 1985), pp. 579-614

    Leitura complementar:
    KINDLEBERG, Charles. "Systems of International Economic Organization," in David Calleo, ed., Money and the Coming World Order. New York: New York University Press, 1976.


  • AULA 5 O DEBATE ENTRE NEOREALISMO versus NEOLIBERALISMO

    Leitura obrigatória:

    BALWIN, David A . “Neoliberalism, neorealism and world politics”. In: BALWIN, David (ed.), (1993), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. Columbia University Press, New York, NY. Pp. 3-25.

    GRIECO, Joseph. “Understanding the problem of international cooperation”. The limits of neoliberal institutionalism and the future of realistic theory”. In: BALWIN, David (ed.), (1993), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press, NY.


  • AULA 6 UM ENFOQUE RACIONALISTA ALTERNATIVO, O NÍVEL DOMÉSTICO E A POLÍTICA INTERNACIONAL

    Leitura obrigatória:

    MILNER, Helen. Interests, institutions and information: domestic politics and international relations. Princenton: Princeton University Press, 1997. Introducao e cap. 4.

    ALLISON, Graham T. Essence of Decision. Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little/Brown, 1971.


    PUTNAM, Robert. (1988). “Diplomacy and domestic politics. The logic of two-level games” International Organization, Vol. 42(3), Jstor.

    Leitura complementar:

    KAHLER, M. 1993. “Bargaining with the IMF: Two-level strategies and developing countries.” In EVANS, P., JACOBSON, H. e PUTNAM, R. Eds. International Bargaining and Domestic Politics: Double-Edged Diplomacy. Berkely, C.A.: University of California Press.
    GARRET, Geofrey & LANGE, Peter. “Internationalization, Institutions and political change”. In: KEOHANE, Robert & MILNER, Helen (eds.). Internationalization and domestic politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.


  • AULA 7 O Neofuncionalismo

    NIEMANN, Arne; SCHMITTER, Philippe. Neofunctionalism. In: WIENER, Antje, e DIEZ, Thomas (eds.). European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

    FREITAS, Luís Sargento. The "Brexit" process understood under neofunctionalist and intergovernmentalist theories of European Integration. ALACIP, 2017.

    HUANG, Eric Rong-yang. The Limitation of Neo-functionalism for Explaining Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations (1979-1996). 1997.

    HAAS, Ernest. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces 1950-57. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958.


  • PRIMEIRA AVALIAÇÃO

  • AULA 8 A ESCOLA INGLESA

    Leitura obrigatória:

    BULL, Hedley. A sociedade Anárquica. Brasília: Editora UNB/Imprensa Oficial São Paulo, 2002, pp. 7-94.


    BUZAN, B. From international to World society? English school theory and the social structure of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 27-62.

    LINKLATER, A. & Suganami, H. The English school of international relations. A contemporary reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 12-80.


    Leitura complementar:
    HALLIDAY, Fred. Repensando as relacoes internacionais. Porto Alegre: Editora da Universidade Federal de Rio Grande do Sul, 1999. Cap.6: “Ausente das relacoes internacionais: as mulheres e a arena internacional”.


  • AULA 9 CONSTRUTIVISMO, O DEBATE TEÓRICO

    Leitura obrigatória:

    ADLER, Emanuel. “O construtivismo no estudo das relações internacionais”, Lua Nova, (47, 1999): 201-246.

    ONUF, Nicholas. "Anarchy, Authority, Rule", International Studies Quarterly, 33, 149-174, 1989. JSTOR.


    _____________. “Levels”. European Journal of International Relations, 1, 35-58, 1995., JSTOR
    WENDT, Alex. Sociology of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 246-312.


    _____________“Anarchy is what states make of it”, International Security (46), (1995): 391- 285. JSTOR

    Leituras complementares
:
    MESSARI, Nizar. “Segurança no pós-Guerra Fria: o Papel das Instituições”. In Estevez, Paulo Luiz (org). Instituições Internacionais: Segurança, Comércio e Integração. Belo Horizonte, Editora da PUC-Minas, 2003.

    HURREL, Andrew. “An emerging security community in South America? In: ADLER, Emanuel & BARNETT, Michael (eds.) Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Presss, 1998.

    RISSE-KAPPEN, Thomas. “U.S power in a liberal security community”. In: G. John Ikenberry (ed.) America Unrivaled: the future of power the balance power. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2002.
    WENDT, Alex. “Collective identity formation and the international state”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 88 (2): 384-394. JSTOR

    Wendt, Alexandre. . “Construing international politics”, International Security, (20), (1995)

  • AULA 10 A TEORIA CRÍTICA, UM DEBATE TEÓRICO

    Leitura obrigatória:

    ASHLEY, R. K. & WALKER, R.B. ”Speaking the language of exile: dissidence in international studies”, Special Issue of International Studies Quarterly 34, (1990). JSTOR


    COX, Robert. “Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations Theory”. In: KEOHANE, Robert. The neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia, 1986.

    LINKLATER, A. The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the pos- Wesphalian era. Columbia: University of South Carolina., 1998, pp. 14-66


  • AULA 11 OS ESTUDOS PÓS-COLONIAIS

    Leitura obrigatória:

    SAID, Edward. Orientalism. London: Penguin, 1977, pp. 18 a 74.


    PUCHALA, Donald. Third word thinking and contemporary international relations, in: International relations theory. NEUMAN, Stephanie C (ed.). New York: San Martins Press, 1998, pp. 133-158.


    TICKNER, Arlene B . (2013). Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist International Relations: 19(3) 627–646.


    TICKNER, Ann. (2001). Gendering World Politics. New York: Columbia, University Press, pp. 1-64.


  • AULA 12 UM BALANÇO DA TEORIA CONTEMPORÂNEA

    Leitura obrigatória

    BROWN, Chris.(2013). The poverty of Grand Theory European Journal of International Relations, 19: 483-497.
    LAKE, David A. (2013) Theory is dead, long live theory: The end of the Great Debates and the rise of eclecticism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19: 567-58.

    DUNNE, Tim; HANSEN, Lene and WIGHT, Colin. (2013) . The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations, 19: 405-425.


  • AULA 13 SEGUNDA AVALIAÇÃO