Topic outline

  • Monitoria:


    • Irma Dutra (mirnadri@gmail.com)
    • Orion Noda (o.noda@usp.br)

  • Aula 1: O Sentido das Teorias de Relações Internacionais

    Textos para debate:

    WALT, S. (2005). The Relationship between Theory and Policy in International Relations. in Annual Review of Political Science, No. 8, 2005, pág. 23-48.

    CHECKEL, J. (2012). “Theoretical Pluralism in IR: possibilities and limits”. in Carlsnaes, W. et al. Handbook of International Relations. 2a Edição. Londres: Sage Publications, pág. 220-241.

    HERMANNR. (2002). “Linking Theory to Evidence in International Relations” in Carlsnaes, W. et al. Handbook of International Relations. 1a Edicão. Londres: Sage Publications, pág. 119-136.

    WALT, S. e MEARSHEIMER, J. (2013). Leaving Theory Behind: why hypothesis testing became bad of IR. Faculty Research Working Paper Series.


  • Aula 2: O Realismo Defensivo

    Texto obrigatório: 
    WALTZ, K. (2002). Teoria das Relações Internacionais. Lisboa: Gradiva, Cap 5 e 6, pág. 113-178. 


    Leituras complementares:

    BROOKSS. (1997). Dueling Realisms. in International Organization, Vol. 53, No. 1.

    SCHWELLER, R. (1993). Tripolarity and the second war. in International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 37,  No. 1.


  • Aula 3: O Realismo Ofensivo

    Texto obrigatório:

    MEARSHEIMER, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W Norton and Company, Caps 2 e 3 , pág. 29-82.

     
    Leituras complementares:

    BROOKSS. (1997). Dueling Realisms. in International Organization, Vol. 53, No. 1.

    SCHWELLER, R. (1993). Tripolarity and the second war. in International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 37,  No. 1.


  • Aula 4: O Institucionalismo

    Texto obrigatório:

    KEOHANER. (1984). After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, Caps.  4, 5 e 6, pág. 49-109.

     

    Leituras complementares:

    KEOHANE, R. e MARTIN, L. (1995). The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. in International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1.

    GRIECO, J. (1993). “Understanding the problem of international cooperation: the limits of neoliberal institutionalism and the future of realistic theory”. in Balwin, D. (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press, pág. 3-25.


  • Aula 5: O Neo-marxismo

    Texto obrigatório:

    WALLERSTEIN, I. (1999). “Patterns and Perspectives of the Capitalist World Economy”. in Viotti, P. e Kauppi, M. International Relations Theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond. Boston: Longman pág, 227-233.

     

    Leitura complementar:

    VIGEVANI, T. et al. (2010). A Contribuição Marxista para o Estudo das Relações Internacionais. Paper apresentado no 7o Encontro da ABCP, Recife.



  • Aula 6: O Construtivismo

    Textos obrigatórios:

    WENDT, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics, in International Organization, Vol. 46, No 2.

    WENDT, A. (2007). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cap. 2, pág. 92-138.

     

    Leitura complementar:

    ADLER, E. (1999). O construtivismo no estudo das relações internacionais. in Lua Nova, No. 47, pág. 201-246.

    FEARON, J. e WENDT, A. (2002). “Rationalism v. Constructivism: a skeptical view”. in CARLSNAES, W. et al. Handbook of International Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002, pág. 52-72.


  • Aula 7: A Teoria Crítica

    Texto obrigatório:

    COX, R. “Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations Theory”. in KEOHANE, Robert. (1986). The neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press.

     
    Leitura complementar:

    LINKLATER, A. (1996). “The achievement of critical theory”, in Smith, S. et al.  International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    SILVA, M. (2005). Teoria Crítica em Relações Internacionais. in Contexto Internacional, Vol. 27, No. 2.



  • Aula 8 – O Pós-modernismo

    Texto obrigatório:

    WALKER, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/Outside: international relations as political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cap. 1, pág. 1-25.

     

    Leitura complementar:

    DEVETAK, R. (1995). Postmodernism. in Burchill e Linklater (org.). Theories of International Relations. New York: St. Martin Press.

    BROWN, C. (1994). “Critical Theory and postmodernism in international relations”, in Groom, A. e Light, M. Contemporary international relations: a guide to theory. Londres: Pinter Publishers.


  • Aula 9 – O Feminismo e a Teoria Queer

    Texto obrigatório:

    TICKNER, J. Ann. (1992). Gender in International Relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security. New York: Columbia University Press, Cap. 1, pág. 1-26.

    THIEL, M. (2014). LGBTQ Politics and International Relations: Here? Queer? Used to it? in International Politics Review, Vol 2, No. 2, pág. 51-60.

     

    Leitura complementar:

    TICKNER, J. Ann. (2002). “Feminist Perspectives on International Relations”. in CARLSNAES, W. et al. Handbook of International Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002, pág. 275-291.

    WITHWORTH, S. (2008). “Feminism”. in SNIDAL, D. e REUS-SMIT, C. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    SJOBERG, L. (2012) Towards trans-gendering IR? in International Political Sociology, Vol. 6, No. 4, pág. 337-354.


  • Aula 10 – O Pós-colonialismo

    Texto obrigatório:

    CHOWDHRY, G. e NAIR, S. (2002). Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender, and Class. Londres: Routledge, Introdução, pág. 1-32.

     

    Leitura complementar:

    DARBY, P. e PAOLINI, A. (1994). Bridging International Relations and Postcolonialism. in Alternatives, Vol. 19, No. 3, pág. 371-397.

    SAID, Edward. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books, Introdução, pág. 1-28.


  • Aula 11 – As Teorias Normativas

    Textos obrigatórios:

    MORRICE, D. (2000). The liberal-communitarian debate in contemporary political philosophy and its significance for International Relations. in Review of International Studies, Vol. 26, pág. 233-246.

    ADLER, E. (2005). Communitarian international relations: the epistemic foundations of International Relations. Oxford: Routledge, pág. 3-14.

     

    Leitura complementar:

    GUIMARÃES, F. (2008). O Debate entre Comunitaristas e Cosmopolitas e as Teorias de Relações Internacionais: Rawls como uma Via Média. in Contexto Internacional, Vol. 30, No. 3, pág. 573-583.

    COCHRAN, M. (1999). Normative theory in international relations: a pragmatic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pág. 21-44 e 52-72.